Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915066›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[The general health examination as opportunity for preventive medicine].

Susanne Balzer, Madeleine Busch, Irmgard Landgraf

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susanne BalzerHausarztpraxis Metz und Balzer, Köln, Deutschland.
Madeleine BuschHausärztliche Versorgung, Diabetologie, Palliativmedizin und Kardiovaskuläre Präventivmedizin, Überörtliche Gemeinschaftspraxis Busch & Reeh, Nierstein, Deutschland.
Irmgard LandgrafHausarztpraxis Dres. Bajohr und Landgraf, Paulsenstraße 5, 12163, Berlin, Deutschland. irmgard@drlandgraf.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Check-up 35 is designed for the early detection of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and kidney diseases as common lifestyle diseases to prevent long-term damage. It also serves to identify personal risk factors, verify and update vaccination status and provide counseling on individually beneficial prevention strategies. To date, it has not been proven that regular check-ups reduce mortality or the utilization of medical services [1]. There are several reasons for this: first, the examinations included in the check-up are insufficient. Second, the individuals who would benefit most often do not participate. Furthermore, the impact of prevention is difficult to quantify. Nevertheless, the check-up is an excellent tool for identifying individual risk factors and lifestyle diseases at an early stage and to react appropriately. It helps bridge vaccination gaps, reduce or delay multimorbidity, the need for long-term care and frailty until later in life, and strengthens the health literacy of the population. In this context, it would be sensible to address the ecological responsibility of each individual as environmental protection is also health protection.

Indexed as

Physical ExaminationPreventive MedicineCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusHealth LiteracyHumansKidney DiseasesLife StyleRisk FactorsCheck-up/adherenceHealth examination/effectsHealth literacyPlanetary healthPrevention strategy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.