Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915049›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026

Artificial intelligence prognostication of liver disease using imaging.

Manil D Chouhan, Kate McLean, James A Thomas, Jason Dowling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manil D ChouhanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5903-1002
Kate McLeanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-8449
James A ThomasSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9122-950X
Jason DowlingAustralian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9349-2275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prognostic tools in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) have the potential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce health care costs. Imaging studies of CLD patients analysed using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for segmentation, detection and classification tasks have the potential to inform and improve prognostic models for liver-related outcomes. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the strengths, weaknesses and approaches to inclusion of AI in prognostic models that use ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We then use a prognostic endpoint-based approach to examine AI-based US, CT and MRI prognostic models in chronic liver disease (CLD). We highlight how AI has been applied to extract imaging features or build predictive models directly, and assess the limitations that currently hinder clinical translation. We also outline key challenges specific to prognostication in CLD and propose directions for future research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingLiver DiseasesChronic DiseaseHumansLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyartificial intelligencecomputed tomographydiagnostic imagingLiver cirrhosisliver diseasesmagnetic resonance imagingprognostic factorsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41915049
PMCPMC13195514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.