Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41915018›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026

Computational identification of salient cancer care topics and themes in oncology social work notes.

Ryzen Benson, Swetha Rajkumar, Clodagh Kenny, Michelle Zhao, Ji-Hyun Chang, Theodore Scheel, Lauren Boreta, Julian C Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryzen BensonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0348-7849
Swetha RajkumarBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-0517-7336
Clodagh KennyBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-8861-3014
Michelle ZhaoBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Ji-Hyun ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Theodore ScheelUCSF Helen Diller Comprehensive Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Lauren BoretaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-9253
Julian C HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-6889

Funding

American Society for Radiation Oncology and the Prostate Cancer FoundationConquer Cancer Foundation, and the UCSF Computational Cancer ResearchNational Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health R01CA277782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial work notes provide a multifaceted narrative of a patient's cancer journey. Topic modeling is a computational technique that can be used to organize notes into thematic clusters and study topics in oncological social work at scale. In this study, we used the BERTopic framework to perform topic modeling of cancer social work notes and identify roles and themes frequently documented in oncological social work.

methodsWe collected 106 676 social work notes from 25 341 patients diagnosed with cancer at the University of California San Francisco. Notes were split at the sentence level, and BERTopic model parameters were optimized experimentally. For each BERTopic cluster, 2 annotators independently assigned labels to 250 randomly selected sentences and keyword sets, with disagreements adjudicated by a third reviewer. Given the same sentences and keywords, 3 large language models independently labelled each cluster. Finally, human-generated and large language model-generated labels were harmonized.

resultsTopic modeling of social work notes revealed 15 topics, classified into 3 distinct subthemes: (1) social worker assessments of patient psychosocial needs and service provision; (2) patient-centric factors, experiences, and the impact of cancer diagnosis on lifestyle; and (3) family and caregiver experiences when caring for someone with cancer.

conclusionTopic modeling supplemented by large language model interpretation reveals complex psychosocial themes in patients receiving social work services during cancer care experience. We envision these methods supporting research that clusters oncological social work notes into thematic cohorts for qualitative studies on how social work care differs across patient strata and how topics are differentially distributed across cancer subtypes.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsNeoplasmsSocial WorkAdolescentAdultAgedCaregiversDocumentationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarrationNeeds AssessmentPatient AdvocacyPsychosocial Support Systems

Identifiers

PMID41915018
PMCPMC13346106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.