ArticleGigaScience2026
scDenorm: a denormalization tool for integrating single-cell transcriptomics data.
Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic benchmarking and optimal strategy selection of cross-species integration methods.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- scDenorm: a denormalization tool for integrating single-cell transcriptomics data.GigaScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Integrating single-cell omics data at an atlas scale enhances our understanding of cell types and disease mechanisms. However, the integration of data processed by different normalization methods can lead to biases, such as unexpected batch effects and gene expression distortion, leading to misinterpretations in downstream analysis. To address these challenges, we present scDenorm, an algorithm that reverts delta-method normalized single-cell omics data to raw counts, preserving the integrity of the original measurements and ensuring consistent data processing during integration. We evaluated scDenorm's performance on large-scale datasets and benchmarked its impact on data integration and downstream analysis across 3 datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.