ArticleRadiology2026
Independent Testing of Published CT Models for PD-L1 Status in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background With the shift toward perioperative programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is a need to assess PD-L1 status preoperatively. Identifying patients who may benefit from immunotherapy using CT-based features has been hampered by the lack of independent testing. Purpose To evaluate the performance of published CT models in predicting PD-L1 status in a multi-institutional external test set of patients with NSCLC undergoing surgery. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, published CT radiomic models predicting PD-L1 expression were identified by literature review spanning January 2017 to July 2023. Models with sufficient reporting quality were recreated for testing, using the features and coefficients that were originally published. Feature standardization parameters were trained in a training set, the publicly available NSCLC Cancer Imaging Archive dataset, containing images collected between April 2008 and September 2012, without label observation, for the sole purpose of test set preprocessing. For comparison, one previously published model was also retrained to predict
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.