Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41914791›Full record

ArticleNurse educator

Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Academic Evidence-Based Practice Workshop With Faculty Certification.

Jayne Jennings Dunlap, Paula Clutter, Julee Waldrop, Shalawn Harris, Cindy Zellefrow, Cindy Beckett, Mehri Mirzaeirafe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse educator. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jayne Jennings DunlapAuthor Affiliations: College of Nursing, Texas Woman's University, Houston, Texas (Drs Dunlap, Clutter, Harris, and Mirzaeirafe); The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Drs Zellefrow and Beckett); and Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina (Dr Waldrop).
Shalawn Harris
Cindy Zellefrow
Cindy Beckett
Mehri Mirzaeirafe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaculty and interdisciplinary partners who support student projects need a clear understanding of research, evidence-based practice (EBP), and quality improvement (QI). PROBLEM: Nursing students across programs are not consistently taught EBP and QI principles. APPROACH: One multicampus College of Nursing invested in a 3-day intensive workshop for the primary purposes of (1) teaching faculty, course, and program leaders and interdisciplinary partners EBP and QI competencies, and (2) earning EBP certification. OUTCOMES: A workshop evaluation was conducted, and EBP certification rates were obtained for faculty teaching in undergraduate and graduate programs. A total of 31 faculty and interdisciplinary partners earned EBP certification. All participants agreed on the need for a future certification that integrates both EBP and QI.

conclusionsThis program is transferable as a model for how faculty can demonstrate competence in EBP and also serve as an exemplar for increasing other types of certifications among nurse educators.

Indexed as

CertificationEvidence-Based PracticeFaculty, NursingAcademiaCurriculumEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateEducation, Nursing, GraduateHumansNursing Education ResearchNursing Evaluation ResearchProgram EvaluationQuality Improvementcompetenciesfaculty developmentnurse educatorteaching

Identifiers

PMID41914791
PMCPMC13286115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.