ArticleExperimental physiology2026
The effects of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in patients with established coronary heart disease.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effects of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in patients with established coronary heart disease.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sedentary behaviour is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In healthy adults, prolonged uninterrupted sitting acutely increases blood pressure (BP) and aortic stiffness; however, these effects can be mitigated with light physical activity interruptions. Whether such mitigation strategies are effective in at-risk populations remains unclear. This study examined the effects of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on BP and arterial stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and femoral-ankle PWV in patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). Using a randomised cross-over design, 14 CHD patients sat for 2 h uninterrupted (control [CON]), and 2 h interrupted with light physical activity (sit-to-stand, calf raises and walking) breaks every 30 min (ACT). Brachial BP and cfPWV were assessed immediately pre- and post-sitting. Time-by-condition effects were tested using linear mixed effects models with baseline adjustments. A significant time × condition interaction effect was detected for systolic BP (P = 0.037) with an increase in CON (mean difference [MD] = 15 mmHg [95% CI: 8, 23], P < 0.001) but not ACT (MD = 4 mmHg [95% CI: -4, 11], P = 0.334). A significant time effect was detected for cfPWV, with an increase across both CON and ACT conditions (MD = 0.76 m/s [95% CI: 0.52, 0.99], P < 0.001). For CHD patients, light activity breaks every 30 min can attenuate the impact of prolonged sitting on BP but not arterial stiffness; higher frequency or intensity of activity breaks may be required for better preservation of cardiovascular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.