Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41914771›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2026

The effects of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in patients with established coronary heart disease.

Simon Fryer, Eve Scarle, Louise Turner, Arsalan Moinuddin, James Faulkner, Hayley Legg, Craig Paterson, Keeron Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon FryerSchool of Health, Education, and Science, Oxstalls Campus, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-0104
Eve ScarleSchool of Health, Education, and Science, Oxstalls Campus, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, UK.
Louise TurnerSchool of Health, Education, and Science, Oxstalls Campus, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0847-2232
Arsalan MoinuddinSchool of Health, Education, and Science, Oxstalls Campus, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4242-1714
James FaulknerPrimary Care Research Centre, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-6737
Hayley LeggSchool of Health, Education, and Science, Oxstalls Campus, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-2091
Craig PatersonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-9712
Keeron StoneCentre for Cardiovascular Research, Innovation and Development (CURIAD), Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6572-7874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedentary behaviour is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In healthy adults, prolonged uninterrupted sitting acutely increases blood pressure (BP) and aortic stiffness; however, these effects can be mitigated with light physical activity interruptions. Whether such mitigation strategies are effective in at-risk populations remains unclear. This study examined the effects of uninterrupted and interrupted sitting on BP and arterial stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), and femoral-ankle PWV in patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD). Using a randomised cross-over design, 14 CHD patients sat for 2 h uninterrupted (control [CON]), and 2 h interrupted with light physical activity (sit-to-stand, calf raises and walking) breaks every 30 min (ACT). Brachial BP and cfPWV were assessed immediately pre- and post-sitting. Time-by-condition effects were tested using linear mixed effects models with baseline adjustments. A significant time × condition interaction effect was detected for systolic BP (P = 0.037) with an increase in CON (mean difference [MD] = 15 mmHg [95% CI: 8, 23], P < 0.001) but not ACT (MD = 4 mmHg [95% CI: -4, 11], P = 0.334). A significant time effect was detected for cfPWV, with an increase across both CON and ACT conditions (MD = 0.76 m/s [95% CI: 0.52, 0.99], P < 0.001). For CHD patients, light activity breaks every 30 min can attenuate the impact of prolonged sitting on BP but not arterial stiffness; higher frequency or intensity of activity breaks may be required for better preservation of cardiovascular function.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcardiovascular diseaseendothelial functionheart diseaselifestyle behavioursprolonged sitting

Identifiers

PMID41914771
PMCPMC13395035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.