ArticleJournal of fish biology2026
DNA-based identification of anadromous fishes (Alosa spp., Family Clupeidae) in stomach contents of marine groundfish.
Article in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using DNA techniques for prey identification is an emerging approach for enhancing the precision and accuracy of trophic information. We evaluated the effectiveness of DNA-based prey identification in conjunction with visual stomach content analysis of commercially important groundfish in the nearshore Gulf of Maine, with a focus on distinguishing consumed anadromous (Alosa spp.) and closely related marine prey (Atlantic herring Clupea harengus, Atlantic menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus). DNA barcoding of 179 consumed prey specimens provided species- or genus-level identification in 122 cases (68.2%), including 104 improvements to taxonomic resolution and three conflicting results compared to visual identifications. Combining DNA-based identifications of partially or well-digested prey with the broader visual analysis substantially improved quantification of a diet metric, frequency occurrence, as a proxy for the relative diet contributions of anadromous and marine clupeids. Body size measurements of consumed Alosa spp. identified using DNA were consistent with year-0 or year-1 juvenile life stages. Possible limitations to success rates of DNA assignment included the quality of sample preservation (ethanol), reference database quality (accuracy of voucher specimen identification) and sequencing errors (miscalling of nucleotide bases). Despite this, the integration of molecular methods substantially improved the interpretability of trophic interactions involving morphologically similar prey with ecologically important differences in life history. These results highlight how the targeted application of DNA-based prey identification can complement conventional diet analyses by improving the quantification of trophic interactions that ultimately govern ecosystem processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.