ArticleActa medica academica2026
A Rare Cadaveric Case Report of the Median Nerve Passing Through the Brachialis Muscle.
Article in Acta medica academica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe a rare cadaveric topographical variation of the median nerve (MN) involving an atypical relationship with the brachialis muscle (BM). Such variations, although uncommon, may complicate surgical procedures, regional anesthesia, and imaging interpretation. This report documents a variation in which the MN traverses the BM without providing motor innervation. CASE REPORT: During the routine dissection of the right upper limb of a 75-year-old male donated cadaver, a unilateral (right-sided) topographical variation of the MN was identified. The MN diverged from its usual close association with the brachial artery (BA) and followed a medial and posterior course toward the BM. Within the middle third of the arm, the nerve penetrated a macroscopically distinct bundle of BM fibers, traversed the muscle belly, and exited in its distal third. Distally, the MN resumed a superficial course, re-approached the BA, and continued normally through the cubital fossa. No motor or accessory branches from the MN to the BM were identified during its intramuscular course. The surrounding muscle fibers closely encircled the nerve along its intramuscular segment, indicating a restricted anatomical corridor. The musculocutaneous nerve, BA, and the remaining neurovascular structures followed their typical anatomical pathways.
conclusionThis anatomical configuration may represent a potential anatomical substrate for proximal MN irritation or compression and may clinically resemble pronator teres syndrome. Awareness of such variants is important for clinicians evaluating MN neuropathies and for surgeons, anesthesiologists, and radiologists working in the anterior compartment of the arm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.