ReviewKorean journal of radiology2026
Imaging-Detected Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Evidence, Standardized Grading, and Clinical Implications.
Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extranodal extension (ENE) of metastatic lymph nodes is a well-established adverse prognostic factor in head and neck cancer and has traditionally been confirmed pathologically. Imaging-detected ENE (iENE) enables pre-treatment assessment and provides prognostic information across different treatment settings. Recent studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated an independent association between iENE and adverse outcomes in both nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma, supporting its prognostic relevance, particularly in nonsurgical patient populations in whom pathological confirmation is unavailable. Growing evidence supporting the prognostic impact of iENE has influenced recent revisions to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 9th edition staging system, which now incorporates "advanced radiological ENE" as a criterion for the N3 category in NPC. However, the clinical interpretation of iENE remains constrained by substantial interobserver variability, heterogeneous imaging criteria, and an imperfect correlation with pathological ENE (pENE), underscoring the ongoing debate regarding its clinical validity. Recent international efforts have sought to standardize imaging definitions and grading systems for iENE, with the aim of reducing variability and facilitating more consistent application in clinical practice and research. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the prognostic and diagnostic roles of iENE, outlines recent developments in its classification, and discusses future directions for its integration into risk-adapted treatment planning for head and neck cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.