Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41914455›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026

Rethinking Alcohol Harm Reduction.

Gabriel Caluzzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gabriel CaluzziCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3203-6123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alcohol harm reduction (AHR) includes a pragmatic set of strategies to reduce the acute harms of alcohol consumption without necessarily reducing use, such as managed alcohol plans and intoxication management facilities. While well established in illicit drug research, harm reduction's application to alcohol remains less explicitly examined, both conceptually and in terms of policy articulation. In contrast to population-level consumption-reduction strategies - many of which are effective at preventing harm - AHR often places greater emphasis on acute and immediate harms and may require consumers to take an active role, a feature that has raised concerns about industry mobilising 'responsible drinking' narratives. AHR also tends to be subsumed within other alcohol policies and has a less consolidated evidence base. However, drawing on international and Australian evidence, this article outlines practical and ethical reasons for a more explicit focus on AHR, including the substantial burden alcohol places on frontline health systems, its disproportionate impacts on socially disadvantaged populations and its frequent involvement in polydrug use and overdose. AHR can also facilitate cross-sectoral collaboration and lateral policymaking, and contribute to the ethical obligation of policymakers to redress the harms of alcohol commercialisation. Beyond formal policy, AHR already occurs in clinical, educational and nightlife settings. Recognising this, future research and policy efforts should focus on clarifying how harm reduction can be more explicitly integrated within alcohol policy frameworks to complement population-level approaches.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHarm ReductionHealth PolicyAustraliaHumansPolicy Makingalcoholalcohol harm reductionalcohol policyharm reduction

Identifiers

PMID41914455
PMCPMC13036818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.