SynthesisCancer2026
Hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax in younger acute myeloid leukemia: Meta-analysis of a shifting treatment paradigm.
Synthesis in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn younger, fit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), intensive chemotherapy (IC) followed by consolidation or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the standard approach. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate younger patients with AML treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA) plus venetoclax.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched through February 2026. Studies included AML patients with a median age <70 years treated with HMA/venetoclax. Primary outcomes were complete remission (CR/CRi) rate, measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity, 1-year overall-survival (OS), 1-year event-free survival (EFS), and rates of HSCT.
resultsEight studies (two randomized controlled trials, two phase 2 trials, and four real-world studies), comprising 429 patients with a mean age of 54 years, were included. The pooled CR/CRi rate was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%-85%), with an MRD-negative rate of 69% (95% CI, 49%-90%). The pooled 1-year OS was 75% (95% CI, 63%-86%), exceeding Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database cohorts (62%). The 1-year EFS was 59% (95% CI, 53%-65%), with low between-study heterogeneity. Overall, 66% of patients successfully proceeded to HSCT. Meta-regression analyses suggested a trend toward improved EFS and OS in studies using decitabine than azacitidine.
conclusionsIn younger patients with AML, HMA plus venetoclax yielded high response rates, MRD negativity, and a substantial proportion of patients proceeding to HSCT. These findings support HMA/venetoclax as an effective induction strategy in selected younger patients and provide a rationale for prospective randomized trials comparing this approach with IC-based regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.