ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2026
Deep Learning-Enhanced Resonance Frequency Analysis for Dental Implant Stability Assessment.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Using a Flex Constant to Monitor Implant Stability Changes in a Porcine Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Intraoperative Ozone Application on Early Implant Stability: A Randomized Split-Mouth Clinical Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAccurate assessment of dental implant stability is critical for predicting osseointegration outcomes and guiding clinical decision-making. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a widely adopted non-invasive method for measuring implant stability quotient (ISQ); however, signal acquisition noise frequently compromises measurement reliability, leading to variable ISQ readings. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning-enhanced RFA framework integrating a denoising convolutional neural network (CNN) with a metadata-aware prediction network to improve ISQ estimation accuracy and signal quality. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective dataset of 100 implants (300 signal samples; three acquisitions per implant) was analyzed. The framework comprised: (1) a denoising CNN to suppress signal contamination and improve signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and (2) a metadata-aware prediction network estimating ISQ from denoised signals and implant-specific parameters (bone density category and insertion torque). Performance was evaluated on a held-out test set (20 implants, 60 samples) using MAE, RMSE, R
resultsThe denoising network reduced noise by up to 85% and improved mean SNR from 12.3 dB to 22.8 dB. The proposed model achieved MAE of 1.85 ISQ, RMSE of 2.40 ISQ, R
conclusionsThe deep learning-enhanced RFA framework substantially improved signal quality and ISQ prediction accuracy over traditional RFA methods, supporting its potential in clinical implant stability monitoring. The framework should currently be regarded as a proof-of-concept; multi-center prospective validation incorporating real-world noise profiling and clinical outcome assessment is required before clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.