Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41914407›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2026

The skills required for transition to university and study in biological sciences: A student perspective.

Janella Borrell, Susan Crennell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janella BorrellDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, UK.
Susan CrennellDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1697-8508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preparation for a university-wide Curriculum Transformation project across the University of Bath, a survey of student opinions of the skills training they received, required and developed during their bioscience studies was undertaken. Separate focus group discussions with first and final-year students defined the parameters of initial and follow-up questionnaires used to determine perceived confidence in 16 different transferrable skills. With responses to the first questionnaire from 204 students (23% of the cohort) the sample size was sufficient to perform statistical analysis on the results. The responses to both questionnaires showed, that by the end of their course the students valued having improved their academic/transferrable skills more than their practical laboratory skills. The survey data and focus group discussions revealed that teamwork, study, time management and organisational skills were perceived to be well developed before arrival at university. While some skills were recognised as having improved through formal teaching (Academic and scientific writing, research, laboratory, analytical and presentation skills), other more transferrable skills were thought to have improved as they are inherent to successful independent living at university and on placement. Actionable suggestions were made for enhancements to formal teaching of important transferrable skills that are not addressed in the current provision such as leadership (through role rotation in group work), resilience and problem-solving (e.g. in practical classes requiring adjustment to succeed). This work suggests that many important transferrable skills are acquired inherently, allowing formal skills training to focus on communication, laboratory, research, leadership, resilience and problem-solving.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesStudentsAcademiaCurriculumFocus GroupsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiescurriculum reviewskills developmenttransition to university

Identifiers

PMID41914407
PMCPMC13398817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.