Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41914375›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health

Self-Organized Men's Mental Health and Well-Being Groups-An Emerging Social Development.

Richard Gater, Jonathan Scourfield, Rhiannon Evans, Paul Willis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard GaterCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3860-7401
Jonathan ScourfieldCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-8158
Rhiannon EvansCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0239-6331
Paul WillisCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-0130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men's mental health is a national and global concern amid consistently higher suicide rates and rising demand and long waiting times for state-funded services. Simultaneously, groups supporting men's health and well-being, such as Men's Sheds and community-led self-help and peer-support initiatives, have expanded. Despite their growth, research on the role of men's peer-support groups in tackling mental health is still in the early stages, with limited understanding of how they function. To begin to address this gap, we surveyed men's mental health and well-being groups throughout Wales (UK) in 2024, to describe their target audience, theoretical basis, activities, and delivery strategies. The online survey included fixed-response items and open-ended questions. Topics covered included group activities, participation frequency, types and numbers of participants, purposes and beliefs, structure and staffing, barriers, and publicity methods. Only 40% of groups reported offering practical activities while 79% reported promoting emotional openness, which could suggest a fairly direct approach to encouraging men to share personal thoughts and experiences is now more widespread than a "health by stealth" approach based around practical activities. Many groups reported rising participation despite operating without formally trained or salaried staff. Research is needed to understand how groups can be optimally delivered to achieve a balance between maintaining informal support structures and ensuring quality control. Further evidence is needed on a range of aspects, including group members' experiences in these groups, program theory in practice, and the effectiveness of the groups in improving mental health.

Indexed as

Men's HealthMental HealthSelf-Help GroupsAdultHumansMaleMen's Health ServicesPeer GroupPsychological Well-BeingSocial GroupSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesWalesemotional opennessmasculinitiesmental healthpeer supportwell-being groups

Identifiers

PMID41914375
PMCPMC13039582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.