ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding radiation exposure and protection among diagnostic radiographers in radiology departments in Shanghai, China.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiation exposure poses health risks for medical professionals in imaging departments. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of diagnostic radiographers regarding radiation exposure and protection.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between June and July 2024 among diagnostic radiographers in Shanghai using convenience sampling knowledge (14 items; score range, 0-28), attitudes (9 items; 9-45), and practices (7 items; 9-45).Correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) explored relationships between KAP domains.
resultsA total of 207 valid questionnaires were collected from diagnostic radiographers. The mean scores were: knowledge 19.05 ± 6.61 (possible range: 0-28), attitude 29.97 ± 5.79 (9-45), and practice 30.51 ± 5.47 (9-45). Correlation analysis revealed significant positive correlations between knowledge-practice (r = 0.390, p < 0.001) and attitude-practice (r = 0.143, p = 0.039). SEM analysis confirmed knowledge directly affected practice (β = 0.446, p = 0.006), while attitude did not significantly mediate this relationship.
conclusionsRadiographers demonstrated insufficient knowledge but moderate attitudes and practices. Based on these findings, tailored education for early-career radiographers, standardized radiation safety protocols (including clear guidance on protective equipment use), and regular departmental audits may help strengthen radiation safety culture and reduce occupational risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.