ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Patient Care Pathways and Outcomes Following Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCare pathways for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are poorly understood and may influence the likelihood of guideline concordant oral anticoagulation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy and associated outcomes.
methodsAdult patients in the Optum Clinformatics Database (2015-2023) with incident AF were identified. Care pathways, by treating clinician specialty (primary care, cardiology, electrophysiology) during each AF-related visit in the 1 year post diagnosis were examined. Cox regression models were used to assess associations between an electrophysiologist visit and AF-related treatments including antiarrhythmic drug therapy and oral anticoagulation and outcomes including AF-related hospitalizations, heart failure hospitalizations, and stroke.
resultsOf the 37 370 patients included, 7700 (20.6%) had a care pathway including an electrophysiologist visit. Older patients (70-79 and 80+ versus 18-49 years: hazard ratio [HR], 0.71 [95% CI, 0.64-0.78] and HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.51-0.63], respectively) and those with a higher CHA
conclusionsCertain demographic groups including older patients had lesser likelihood of electrophysiologist consultation, but guideline concordant care was more likely associated with electrophysiology care pathways. Electrophysiology care pathways were associated with improved outcomes especially among the groups with greatest stroke risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.