Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41914320›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2026

Deep Learning for Automated Tumor Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images.

Miri Seo, YongDae Lee, Myung-Won You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miri SeoDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2895-6787
YongDae LeeDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1276-9522
Myung-Won YouDepartment of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. twrad2282@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6262-5784

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1C1C1012477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a deep learning (DL)-based automated segmentation model for rectal cancer on T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 458 patients who underwent baseline rectal MR imaging were retrospectively enrolled. An experienced radiologist labeled the tumor on each slice of the selected T2W axial images covering the entire tumor mass, and tumor volume was measured during labeling. Another radiologist labeled the rectum on the same images. Attention U-Net was trained on the T2W images from the training dataset to classify each voxel as tumor or non-tumor. Segmentation with or without rectum guidance was compared using evaluation metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), in the test dataset.

resultsThe tumor segmentation DSC without rectum guidance was 73.35% (71.97-74.71); that with the predicted rectum was 71.79% (70.53-73.05); and that with the overlaid rectum was 75.52% (74.32-76.62), which was the highest among the three segmentation models. Tumor volume showed a positive correlation with tumor segmentation accuracy with the predicted rectum (r=0.333,

conclusionA DL-based automated segmentation model can predict RC with over 70% accuracy, which was further improved with overlaid rectum, and larger tumor volume.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleRetrospective Studiesartificial intelligenceDeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingrectal cancertumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID41914320
PMCPMC13040183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.