ArticleJournal of diabetes research2026
Study on the Potential Mechanism of Astragaloside IV on Renoprotection in Db/Db Mice via Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation.
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Study on the Potential Mechanism of Astragaloside IV on Renoprotection in Db/Db Mice via Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsDiabetic nephropathy (DN) is a highly predominant and critical microvascular complication associated with diabetes mellitus. Astragaloside IV (AS-IV), the main active component in Radix Astragali, is associated with various pharmacological effects, including on DN. Nevertheless, the fundamental mechanism through which AS-IV ameliorates DN is still unclear. Therefore, this research seeks to explore the molecular mechanisms underpinning the therapeutic effectiveness of AS-IV for DN using network pharmacology and experimental validation.
methodsInitially, DN mouse models were created and administered AS-IV treatment. Key metabolic parameters were assessed, and pathological alterations in the mice's kidneys were examined. Subsequently, the GEO database and other online public databases were utilized to detect DN-correlated targets and the primary AS-IV targets. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of overlapping targets was created to pinpoint core targets using Cytoscape software. These core targets underwent GO and KEGG analyses. Differential gene analysis and ROC curve analysis were then conducted on the core targets. Finally, western blotting was conducted to confirm the expression changes of core targets and pathway proteins.
resultsAS-IV treatment markedly reduced fasting blood glucose (FBG), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), body weight (BW), urinary albumin excretion (UAE), and serum creatinine (Scr) levels and alleviated histopathological alterations in the DN mice's kidneys. Twelve key core targets were identified through GEO data analysis and network pharmacology, with four core targets (MMP-9, MPO, IL-6, and IL-1β) emerging after more stringent screening. Enrichment analysis illustrated that these genes predominantly participated in biological processes, such as regulating oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, and were part of pathways like TNF, IL-17, and AGE-RAGE signaling in DM complications. Western blotting further displayed that AS-IV treatment downregulated the levels of DN-affected proteins MMP-9, MPO, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α.
conclusionsOverall, combining the network pharmacology and experimental validation offers a precise elucidation of the molecular mechanism by which AS-IV treats DN. Additionally, it proposes a novel approach for identifying the active components of traditional Chinese medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.