ReviewThe Biochemical journal2026
Understanding single stranded DNA gaps: from formation to fate.
Review in The Biochemical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA gaps (ssDNA gaps) have emerged as a potential indicator of therapeutic response in cancer. Accumulation of ssDNA gaps is associated with increased sensitivity of cancer cells to genotoxic therapies like PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and cisplatin chemotherapy. However, efficient repair or suppression of ssDNA gap formation is associated with therapy resistance and treatment failure. Therefore, understanding how ssDNA gaps form and are repaired can help identify biomarkers that can guide new treatment strategies to overcome resistance. In this review, we discuss different sources of ssDNA gap formation and the repair mechanisms that have been characterized to date. We bring together current knowledge on how these gaps are processed and what their ultimate fate may be. Finally, we discuss how established drugs like PARPi, hydroxyurea, and platinum compounds, induce and/or exploit ssDNA gaps. Throughout this review, we highlight ssDNA gaps as a potential therapeutic vulnerability that can be used to advance personalized cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.