SynthesisJournal of foot and ankle research2026
From Pressure Patterns to Personalized Insoles: A Systematic Review of Demographic Influences on Plantar Pressure.
Synthesis in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlantar pressure distribution is a widely used biomechanical measure for characterizing foot-ground loading during gait in research and clinical assessment. Demographic variables, such as sex, age, and body weight, influence plantar loading patterns; however, findings across studies have been inconsistent, limiting direct clinical interpretation.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2013 and 2025 that investigated the relationship between plantar pressure and sex, age, or body weight in healthy, asymptomatic individuals. Eligible studies were screened, data were extracted, and subgroup analyses were performed to assess pressure differences across specific foot regions. Protocol registered in PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251083389).
resultsSex-specific differences revealed that women exhibited higher plantar pressure in the hallux, whereas men demonstrated greater loading in the heel and lateral heel regions. In older adults, a posterior-to-anterior shift in pressure was observed, with decreased heel loading and increased pressure in the forefoot, midfoot, and fifth metatarsal. Obesity was associated with significantly elevated plantar pressure in the first, fourth, and fifth metatarsals as well as in the heel, midfoot, and forefoot, whereas hallux pressure was relatively reduced compared to individuals of normal weight. Across all subgroup analyses, six foot regions, namely, the hallux, first, fourth, and fifth metatarsals, midfoot, and total heel consistently showed moderate to strong effect sizes.
conclusionsThis study summarizes population-specific plantar pressure patterns associated with sex, age, and body weight. The hallux, selected metatarsals, midfoot, and heel consistently demonstrated pooled differences across studies and are highlighted as regions of interest for future research. These findings provide descriptive biomechanical reference patterns that may support hypothesis-driven investigations into plantar load redistribution and comfort-related outcomes. These findings should therefore be interpreted as providing comparative biomechanical context rather than direct clinical decision-making criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.