ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2026
Unnecessary dental extractions in patients with Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain: a qualitative and questionnaire-based study of patient perspectives.
Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to explore the perspectives of individuals with Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP) who sought dental extractions for pain relief and to identify common themes from their experiences. PIFP significantly impacts the quality of life, leading many patients to undergo unnecessary dental procedures on healthy teeth for pain relief. Recognizing unique characteristics in patients with a history of such interventions could help prevent unnecessary treatments and associated complications.
methodsWe conducted qualitative research at the Headache Clinic, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, involving 12 consecutive patients with PIFP who had undergone dental extractions. Data were collected through medical records, interviews, and questionnaires. The recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative research guidelines, with a focus on descriptive, linguistic, and conceptual comments.
resultsTwelve participants aged 28-83 were included in the study. Data analysis revealed three main themes: (1) physical metaphors ("like an exposed nerve"), (2) emotional and cognitive reactions to pain ("life had stopped"), and (3) encounters with the medical establishment ("not just injustice, it's medical negligence"). Physical metaphors included additional somatization, symbolic penetration, facial pain analogous to emotional pain or a traumatic event, and pain as a silencer. Emotional and cognitive reactions included catastrophic reactions, incomprehensibility, loss of agency, and disconnection from emotional pain. Finally, encounters with the medical establishment included complex interactions with medical figures, as well as confusion and perplexity with the medical system.
conclusionsThis qualitative study offers insights into the subjective experiences of PIFP patients. The identified themes highlight shared challenges and the multifaceted nature of PIFP, underscoring the need for comprehensive, multidisciplinary approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.