ReviewCureus2026
Effect of Non-selective Beta-Blockers on the Prevention of Decompensation in Compensated Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) in preventing first decompensation and disease progression in patients with compensated cirrhosis, with emphasis on those with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, representing both historic endoscopy-based studies and modern hemodynamically defined cohorts. The synthesis demonstrates that NSBBs confer meaningful benefit only after the hemodynamic threshold of CSPH is reached, as exemplified by contemporary trials showing reduced risk of decompensation, particularly ascites, while earlier studies enrolling patients without confirmed CSPH or with mild portal hypertension did not demonstrate benefit and, in some cases, suggested potential harm. Carvedilol showed additional promise in delaying variceal progression even with modest HVPG reduction, indicating potential mechanisms beyond portal pressure lowering. Across trials, the variability in outcomes was explained by differences in baseline hemodynamic severity, selection criteria, and methodological rigor, highlighting the importance of disease-stage-specific application. Overall, the findings support a shift toward targeted NSBB therapy in compensated cirrhosis with confirmed or probable CSPH, rather than universal prophylaxis in all compensated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.