ArticleCureus2026
Compliance and Barriers in Hospital Price Transparency: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Alabama Hospitals With Emphasis on Spinal Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHospitals have been required to provide price transparency through various acceptable formats under federal regulatory guidance. Our objective was to assess levels of compliance among hospitals in Alabama, with an emphasis on centers performing spine surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional policy evaluation utilized the Alabama Hospital Association (AHA) website to identify 124 hospitals in the state. Psychiatric and Veterans Affairs facilities were excluded, resulting in 106 hospitals for final analysis. Hospitals were dichotomized by pricing accessibility in accordance with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. The presence of cash-discount pricing was assessed using each hospital's online pricing tool.
resultsAll hospitals (106/106) had a price transparency feature available. An online cost calculator was provided by 54.72% (58/106), while 44.34% (47/106) used a generic charge sheet or downloadable file. One hospital (0.94%) required a phone call to obtain pricing information. Personal information was required for access by 33.96% (36/106) of hospitals, whereas 20.75% (22/106) did not require personal information. Among hospitals requiring personal information, 19.44% (7/36) did not provide an available charge sheet. Among hospitals not requiring personal information, 81.82% (18/22) provided cash discount information, 45.45% (10/22) performed elective spinal surgery, and 54.55% (12/22) did not require personal information to obtain an insurance-based price estimate.
conclusionsMost hospitals in Alabama are compliant with CMS price transparency requirements. However, substantial variation exists in the depth and accessibility of pricing information, with only a minority of hospitals meeting all CMS guideline elements. These inconsistencies represent ongoing barriers to effective price transparency and may limit the intended impact of CMS regulations on price sensitivity and competition within healthcare markets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.