ArticleCureus2026
One-Year Functional Outcomes of Medial Congruent, Manually Instrumented Total Knee Replacements.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) following mechanically aligned, manually instrumented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a medial congruent design. Secondary objectives included assessment of complication rates, reoperations, and revision-free survivorship at one year.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of 200 consecutive primary TKAs performed by a single surgeon. The cohort included 90 male and 110 female patients with a mean age of 73 years at the time of surgery. All procedures were performed using manual instrumentation with mechanical alignment targets and a medial congruent polyethylene design. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the KOOS-JR preoperatively, at six weeks postoperatively, and at approximately one year following surgery. Complications, reoperations, and revision procedures were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes and complication rates.
resultsThe mean preoperative KOOS-JR score was 56.2. At six weeks postoperatively, the mean KOOS-JR score improved to 78.3, demonstrating substantial early functional improvement. At an average follow-up of one year, the mean KOOS-JR score further improved to 89.4, indicating sustained and clinically meaningful gains in pain relief and function. No revision surgeries were required during the study period, resulting in 100% implant survivorship at the latest follow-up. Six patients (3%) required manipulation under anesthesia for postoperative stiffness. No cases of early aseptic loosening, mechanical failure, or implant-related instability were identified.
conclusionsIn this retrospective series, mechanically aligned primary TKA performed with manual instrumentation and a medial congruent implant design resulted in significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes, low complication rates, and excellent early implant survivorship. The observed improvements in KOOS-JR scores exceeded established thresholds for clinical significance and were maintained at one year postoperatively. These findings support the effectiveness and reproducibility of this surgical approach for primary TKA and suggest that favorable outcomes can be achieved without the routine use of advanced alignment technologies. Longer-term follow-up and comparative studies are warranted to confirm durability and assess outcomes relative to alternative alignment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.