ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Effects of transcranial photobiomodulation on performance and cardiovascular responses in trained cyclists.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcranial photobiomodulation (PBM) has been proposed to enhance prefrontal cortex (PFC) oxygenation and modulate central mechanisms of fatigue, potentially improving endurance performance. This study investigated the acute effects of PBM on cycling time-trial (TT) performance in well-trained cyclists. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, 18 trained cyclists completed two experimental conditions (PBM and SHAM) prior to a constant-load (CL) test at 5% above the first lactate threshold (LT1) and a 25-min self-paced TT on their own bicycles mounted on an ergometer. Results: No significant condition × time interactions were found for heart rate, blood lactate, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), or power-related ratios during either the constant-load or TT trials (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Acute transcranial PBM did not influence cycling performance or perceptual and physiological responses in trained athletes. These findings suggest that the applied PBM parameters may have been insufficient to elicit measurable cortical or performance effects. Future research should explore optimized stimulation parameters and chronic application protocols to clarify the potential ergogenic role of PBM in endurance exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.