ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2026
Preoperative Portal Vein Thrombosis Grading Predicts Post-Transplant Thrombosis and Survival.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have suggested an association between preoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and post-transplant PVT occurrence, but comprehensive evidence evaluating the impact of thrombosis severity grading remains limited. Objective: To investigate the influence of preoperative PVT grading on cumulative PVT occurrence time and survival outcomes following liver transplantation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients undergoing deceased donor liver transplantation between April 2020 and October 2023. All patients underwent dual-modality imaging assessment (Doppler ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced CT/MRI) for PVT grading according to the Yerdel classification. A standardized anticoagulation protocol was implemented postoperatively. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative incidence, Fine-Gray competing risk models adjusting for death as a competing event, multivariable Cox regression analysis, and comprehensive sensitivity analyses. Results: Among 126 enrolled patients, the preoperative PVT grading distribution showed significant differences in cumulative post-transplant PVT risk (Grade 0: 14.3%, Grade I: 52.4%, Grade II: 71.4%, Grade III: 85.7%, p<0.001). Fine-Gray competing risk analysis confirmed grading as an independent predictor after adjusting for death (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] for Grade III vs Grade 0: 6.24, 95% CI: 3.81-10.21, p<0.001). The combined predictive model incorporating PVT grading, donor factors, and ALBI score achieved superior discrimination (1-year AUC: 0.876; 2-year AUC: 0.843) compared to binary PVT assessment alone (1-year AUC: 0.739, p<0.001). Tertile-based risk stratification revealed significant differences in 3-year survival rates (high-risk: 76.2%, intermediate-risk: 88.1%, low-risk: 95.2%, p<0.001). Conclusion: Preoperative PVT grading represents a crucial predictor of cumulative PVT risk and survival differences after liver transplantation. Implementation of dual-modality imaging assessment and risk-stratified anticoagulation protocols may optimize post-transplant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.