Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913804›Full record

ArticlePopulation and environment2026

An environment and comprehensive wellbeing (ECW) conceptual framework: exploring environmental relationships with objective and subjective wellbeing.

Laurence Cannings, Craig W Hutton, Kristine Nilsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population and environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurence CanningsDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography and WorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK.
Craig W HuttonSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK.
Kristine NilsenDepartment of Social Statistics and Demography and WorldPop, School of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wellbeing and environment are inherently interlinked and, as such, should be supported by a framework that captures multiple relationships between people and ecosystems. A comprehensive wellbeing assessment encompasses broad objective and subjective indicators which account for local community and governance priorities, and acknowledge wellbeing as relational to the time and space it is constructed. While existing frameworks address components of the environment-wellbeing system, they often do not incorporate comprehensive wellbeing within an environmental context. The Environment and Comprehensive Wellbeing framework addresses this gap, supporting research on the impacts of climatic hazards, landscape characteristics, and environmental policy interventions upon wellbeing in low- and middle-income countries. The framework is novel in its exploration of how objective and subjective wellbeing interact, and how the relational context, including environmental conditions over various timescales, impact these relationships. Despite being primarily designed to explore local wellbeing, the framework contains sufficient breadth to facilitate multiscale research. The framework is applied to a mixed-method example in Volta Delta, Ghana. The prominence of subsistence agriculture within the environmentally vulnerable delta accentuates the interconnectivity between livelihoods, wellbeing and environment. Applying this novel framework provides a platform for a deeper understanding of the findings. For example, a context-specific dichotomy between low objective and high subjective wellbeing was illustrated in drought-impacted agricultural areas. Research deploying an exclusively objective approach may have omitted information on how collective community norms could promote sustainable activities, while a subjective approach may have overlooked requirements for more-immediate material support, highlighting the synergistic benefit of encompassing subjective and objective wellbeing. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11111-026-00518-w.

Indexed as

ClimateComprehensive wellbeingEnvironmentFrameworkObjective wellbeingSubjective wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41913804
PMCPMC13032941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.