ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2026
Close-to-Patient Models for Gastric Cancer: From Patient-Derived Xenograft Towards a Novel Gastric Cancer Mini-Tumor Model.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most lethal form of cancer. Because of its late diagnosis, high intratumor heterogeneity, and the presence of a dense stromal compartment, GC is less susceptible to systemic treatments compared to other tumor types. Many systemic therapies, developed to support curative and palliative treatment for GC and other cancers, did not reach the clinic, which might be due to the fact that preclinical data, obtained from simple cell-based models, does not translate to the complex GC tumor structure and the occurrence of drug resistance. Therefore, this study is aimed to establish fibroblast-rich, close-to-patient models for GC and evaluate their robustness by comparison with the primary GC tissue from the respective patients. Material and Methods: Five different GC models were established: I) a subcutaneous and II) orthotopic patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model, III) an in vitro patient-derived organoid (PDO) model, which was IV) subcutaneously engrafted in vivo, and V) co-cultured with GC fibroblasts to form a novel multicellular fibroblast-rich GC model. Histology, immunohistochemistry, mutational status and tumor/stroma composition were compared between the parental tissues and the various models. Results: Both PDX models reflected the histological structure of the parental tissue, consisting of distinct parenchymal and stromal compartments. Primary tumor mutations were maintained in the PDX, as well as markers of clinical interest, like HER2. Orthotopic GC-PDX models showed high growth rates, accompanied by significant stromal accumulation. GC-PDOs showed histological similarities with parental tissues, maintaining the various histological phenotypes. Engrafted subcutaneously in mice, these organoids generated stroma-rich tumors. To mimic these features in vitro, we established a multicellular model composed of GC-associated fibroblasts and GC organoids, aggregating into complex multicellular structures with high similarity to parental GC tumor tissues. Conclusion: We generated five close-to-patient GC models, which can potentially facilitate preclinical evaluations of novel therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.