Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913782›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Public acceptance of LLM-driven healthcare chatbots in China: An empirical study.

Ying Qian, Yuxin Fu, Yanting Chen, Ke Lu, Xin Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ying QianBusiness School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1995-9153
Yuxin FuBusiness School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0905-0207
Yanting ChenBusiness School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Ke LuBusiness School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Xin ZhaoBusiness School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9297-8790

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LLM-driven healthcare chatbots for preliminary medical consultation are a promising innovation to improve healthcare accessibility and efficiency. However, public acceptance of this technology in the Chinese context, especially the impact of users' previous experience with relevant technologies on user behavior, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we extended the classical Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework by examining the moderating effects of users' previous experience with telemedicine and large language models (LLMs). Using a scenario-based survey, we collected 502 valid responses from general Chinese users and analyzed the data through Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Our results demonstrated that performance expectancy, social influence, trust, and facilitating conditions were significant contributing factors, whereas effort expectancy was not, which contradicts previous literature. Moreover, users' previous experience with LLMs exhibited significant moderating effects whereas previous experience with telemedicine didn't. These findings contribute to the literature by suggesting that as LLMs become more widely adopted, users' familiarity with them may enhance trust and, consequently, increase the general acceptance of LLM-driven healthcare chatbots.

Indexed as

LLM-driven healthcare chatbotsmoderating effectspublic acceptancestructural equation modelingUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID41913782
PMCPMC13033065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.