ArticleDigital health
Deep neural network-based robust framework for automated skin lesion segmentation and analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Skin lesion segmentation plays a critical role in computer-aided diagnosis systems, serving as a foundation for the early detection and treatment of skin cancer. Nonetheless, obtaining accurate segmentation remains difficult because of inconsistencies in lesion visual features, texture, image sharpness, and the presence of indistinct edges. Objective: To develop and evaluate a novel deep neural network (DNN)-based approach for robust and accurate segmentation of skin lesions from dermoscopic images using advanced pre-processing and post-processing techniques. Methods: The proposed method integrates a DNN architecture with specialized pre-processing and post-processing modules. The pre-processing step enhances image quality by denoising and normalizing the lesion intensities. The DNN framework extracts hierarchical features, while the post-processing module refines segmentation masks by correcting boundary irregularities and removing artifacts. The model was tested using three widely recognized dermoscopic International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) image databases from the years 2016, 2017, and 2018 without extensive data augmentation. Statistical analysis, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, was conducted to compare performance with existing methods. Results: The proposed method achieved Jaccard index scores of Conclusions: This study presents a high-performing, scalable solution for automated skin lesion segmentation. The proposed method effectively addresses critical challenges by integrating robust feature extraction and boundary refinement, making it well-suited for real-world clinical applications in skin cancer diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.