ArticleDigital health
Predicting childhood anaemia in Ghana with explainable machine learning: A national survey analysis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction and risk factor analysis of depression among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: Findings from the BDHS 2022.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Childhood anaemia remains a major public health problem in Ghana, with marked regional and socioeconomic disparities. Conventional regression may not fully capture complex, non-linear relationships among biological, maternal, and household factors. We used supervised machine learning to predict anaemia among children aged 6-59 months using nationally representative survey data. Methods: We analysed the 2022 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, including de facto children aged 6-59 months with valid haemoglobin and complete covariates (weighted N = 3,382). Anaemia was defined as altitude-adjusted haemoglobin <11.0 g/dL. Twenty-one predictors were included. Data were split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets using stratified sampling. Six models (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machine, and artificial neural network) were tuned via grid search with 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The weighted prevalence of childhood anaemia was 48.95% (n = 1,655). Gradient boosting showed the best overall discrimination (AUC = 0.72; F1 = 68.99%; accuracy = 66.27%). Support vector machine and logistic regression achieved the highest sensitivity (recall = 72.73% and 71.74%). Random forest showed overfitting (100% training accuracy; test accuracy = 65.23%). Decision tree and neural network performed poorly (AUC = 0.57 and 0.63). Key predictors across models and SHAP were child age, malaria status, maternal anaemia, region, and household wealth (with feature rankings varying by algorithm). Conclusion: Machine learning models achieved moderate predictive performance for childhood anaemia in Ghana. Gradient boosting provided the strongest discrimination, while support vector machine and logistic regression offered higher sensitivity for screening. However, these sensitivities imply that approximately 28-30% of anaemic children may be missed, which should be considered when applying these models in public health screening. Identified determinants support targeted, malaria-integrated nutrition and maternal-child interventions in high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.