ArticleSSM. Mental health2026
Couples-based interventions for perinatal depression and anxiety: A global systematic review.
Article in SSM. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Globally, perinatal depression and anxiety affect approximately 26% and 12% of women, respectively, with partner support recognized as a protective factor. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of couples-based interventions for perinatal depression and/or anxiety. Methods: We searched PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL from inception through December 1, 2024, identifying studies published in English that met our eligibility criteria. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. We conducted a narrative synthesis. Results: From 4733 screened records, 26 studies (23 RCTs, three quasi-experimental) met the inclusion criteria, comprising 4547 women from 14 countries. Fourteen of 26 studies (54%) demonstrated significant reductions in maternal depressive symptoms. Descriptive synthesis suggested effectiveness may depend more on intervention content than partner attendance patterns: interventions teaching specific support skills (symptom recognition, practical assistance, help-seeking facilitation) appeared effective across varying attendance levels, while relationship enhancement approaches showed inconsistent results. Six of 12 studies measuring anxiety reported significant reductions, with mixed evidence regarding the role of partner attendance. Studies reported inconsistent effects on paternal mental health and relationship quality. Risk of bias was low in 52% of RCTs. Conclusion: Couples-based interventions show promise for reducing perinatal depression and anxiety, though substantial heterogeneity prevents identification of optimal approaches. Descriptive patterns suggest effectiveness may depend more on intervention content than on the number of sessions partners attended, though this hypothesis requires formal testing through meta-analysis with moderator analyses. Absence of mediation analyses across all studies prevented understanding of mechanisms, and geographic concentration in high-income settings limited generalizability to LMIC contexts. Prospero registration: CRD42024618459.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.