Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913669›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Progress Through Engagement: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Community-Based Participatory Research in Vision Impairment.

Aikaterini Tavoulari, Jibraan Kidwai, Michael J Proulx, Karin Petrini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aikaterini TavoulariDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6138-0965
Jibraan KidwaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-6604-0075
Michael J ProulxDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4066-3645
Karin PetriniDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5354-5600

Funding

Guide Dogs UK [RE-PS1254]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVision impairment (VI) presents complex challenges that extend beyond clinical measures, affecting individuals' mental health, social participation and quality of life. Traditional research often overlooks these lived realities, prompting a growing interest in community-based participatory research (CBPR) as a more inclusive and impactful approach.

methodsThis systematic review examines the scope, frequency and methodological characteristics of CBPR studies involving people with VI, with a focus on qualitative research published between 1993 and 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration, included studies were identified across diverse cultural contexts and participatory depths, from consultation to collaboration and user-driven design. Using a dual-stage thematic synthesis, we explored both the methodological approaches ('how') and the substantive content themes ('what') addressed in these studies. Participatory methods included photography and narrative storytelling, focus groups, creative workshops and final consultations, with many studies employing methodological triangulation. Although the search covered the period 1993-2024, all included studies were published between 2014 and 2024, reflecting the recent emergence of CBPR approaches in VI research.

resultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. Thematic findings revealed barriers to accessibility, cultural misalignment in interventions and the importance of user-led adaptation strategies, showing that despite growing interest, CBPR remains underutilised in VI research.

conclusionThis review highlights its potential to bridge gaps between clinical innovation and lived experience, offering a roadmap for more equitable, context-sensitive and user-centred research practices. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and members of the public were not directly involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of this systematic literature review. Instead, the study focus and synthesis were informed by documented experiences of people with vision impairment, derived from community-based participatory studies, which contributed to the development of patient-centred health material design.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchVision DisordersHumansQualitative ResearchQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41913669
PMCPMC13125725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.