Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913658›Full record

ArticleResearch report (Health Effects Institute)2025

Measuring and Modeling Air Pollution and Noise Exposure Near Unconventional Oil and Gas Development in Colorado.

J L Collett, D Pan, L McKenzie, D Zimmerle, W Zhang, Y Zhou, Seongjun Kim, I-T Ku, A Sullivan, J Pierce and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research report (Health Effects Institute), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J L CollettAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
D PanSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
L McKenzieSchool of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
D ZimmerleEnergy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
W ZhangAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Y ZhouAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Seongjun KimAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
I-T KuAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
A SullivanAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
J PierceAtmospheric Science Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
W AllshouseSchool of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
S LevineSchool of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
G P DugganEnergy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
E RimelmanEnergy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRapid growth in unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD), driven by improvements in directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies, has made the United States the world's largest producer of oil and natural gas. Rapid UOGD expansion in Colorado's Denver-Julesburg (DJ) Basin, often intersecting with a growing population, has elevated local concerns about noise and air quality impacts. Independent near-pad observations of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) exposure and noise are uncommon, particularly during well drilling and completions, where evolving technologies and practices continue to alter emissions. The chief goals of this study were to identify potential impacts of UOGD HAPs emissions on nearby communities, characterize A- and C-weighted noise impacts from UOGD operations, and contextualize air and noise pollution measurement and modeling results at health-relevant temporal and spatial scales. Our focus was on the DJ Basin, where a changing regulatory environment has driven innovation to better protect human health and the environment, and past observations facilitate examining whether new operational practices have reduced impacts.

methodsAir quality and noise impacts of UOGD operations conducted by three major DJ Basin operators were studied at four large well pads at three locations across the basin. Studied operations included well drilling, hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing/millout operations, flowback, and early production. Methane and speciated volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements were made at near-pad and background locations to characterize increases in concentrations associated with specific UOGD activities. Air dispersion modeling was conducted to assess impacts as a function of distance from well pad operations. A- and C-weighted noise levels were monitored at multiple locations.

resultsNear-pad concentration increases of UOGD-related VOCs were most prominent on short timescales, with the most concentrated plumes often one to two orders of magnitude more concentrated than regional background concentrations but typically persisting for less than an hour at a given location. Benzene and, during drilling operations, n-nonane levels came closest to their respective chronic noncancer inhalation health guideline values (HGVs) but remained well below these levels. One-hour benzene levels exceeded 9 parts per billion by volume (ppbv), the acute HGV, on several occasions during different operational phases. Analyses of VOC emissions from specific operational practices provide the first estimate of speciated VOC emission rates from coiled tubing/millout operations, revealed increased emission of C Noise parameters for A- and C-weighted noise consistently exceeded Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) thresholds for chronic noise at the minimum compliance point (350 feet) during all activities monitored. At the maximum compliance point (1,975 feet), A-weighted noise no longer exceeded ECMC chronic thresholds during drilling and coiled tubing/millout activities and only sporadically exceeded ECMC chronic thresholds during hydraulic fracturing. However, C-weighted noise consistently exceeded ECMC chronic thresholds during drilling and hydraulic fracturing and sporadically exceeded ECMC chronic thresholds during coiled tubing/millout operations.

conclusionsConsistent with prior work in the DJ Basin, noise from UOGD operations poses a concern during well drilling and completions, while the greatest air pollutant exposure risk is associated with acute exposure to benzene. This finding highlights the importance of high time-resolution monitoring to document risk near UOGD preproduction operations. Increased utilization of improvements to preproduction operational practices, including the use of grid-powered, electrified drill rigs, synthetic drilling muds, and closed-loop, tankless fluid-handling systems, has reduced air quality and some noise impacts around the DJ Basin UOGD, while Colorado's implementation of a 2,000-foot setback distance has increased protection from HAPs exposure for those living near new well pads. UOGD operations in many other basins are not conducted using the same emission-reducing operational practices, and residents elsewhere often do not enjoy the protection of a 2,000-foot setback; our analyses find considerably higher risk at 500 feet.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir PollutionEnvironmental ExposureNoiseOil and Gas IndustryColoradoEnvironmental MonitoringHumansNatural GasOil and Gas FieldsAir PollutantsNatural Gas

Identifiers

PMID41913658
PMCPMC13036433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.