ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Omission of clinical target volume in radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of radiotherapy with omitted clinical target volume (CTV) in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsA total of 423 NSCLC patients admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to April 2024 were enrolled. Among them, 112 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 58 patients in the experimental group and 54 patients in the control group. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 66 patients were included in the final analysis, with 33 patients in each group. All patients received radical radiotherapy and were divided into experimental and control groups based on whether CTV was omitted. The efficacy and adverse reactions between the two groups were analyzed.
resultsThe objective response rates were 45.4% in the experimental group and 57.5% in the control group (
conclusionIn this cohort study of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) undergoing radiation therapy, no statistically significant difference in survival was observed with omission of the CTV. However, omitting the CTV could reduce the incidence of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis, thereby alleviating the adverse reactions associated with this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.