ReviewWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2026
The 'costs' of absorbent hygiene product mismanagement: A mini-review of contemporary literature from the Global South.
Review in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mismanagement of absorbent hygiene product (AHP) waste - including disposable diapers, sanitary pads, and incontinence products - represents an emerging but understudied challenge across the Global South. Rapid urbanization and increased uptake of disposable hygiene products have outpaced the development of adequate waste management systems, leaving AHPs largely unsegregated, untreated, and unmanaged. This mini-review synthesizes contemporary literature from the Global South to explore the 'costs' associated with three common mismanagement scenarios: co-disposal with household waste, management outside formal systems, and non-management in the environment. Findings reveal that while the spaces of mismanagement are well documented, the costs remain poorly understood, unevenly distributed and often hidden. Co-disposal exacerbates landfill overcapacity, cross-contamination and greenhouse gas emissions; disposal outside waste systems burdens sanitation networks with blockages and infrastructure damage; and non-management disperses risks into public domains, contaminating soils and waterways, shortening pit latrine lifespans and compounding health hazards for households and sanitation workers. Across contexts, these costs are borne disproportionately by vulnerable groups, including women, children, animals, informal waste workers and low-income households, yet remain largely absent from policy debates and product life cycle assessments. Addressing these gaps requires more context-specific case studies, quantification of costs and greater recognition of disposal within sustainability frameworks to ensure equitable and effective interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.