ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Global Sensitivity Analysis for Robust XAI: Quantifying Clinical Risk and Prediction Instability in Dermoscopic Image Classification.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantum computing in finance: a literature review and future directions for trustworthy financial AI.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high nominal accuracy achieved by deep learning models in predicting malignant skin lesions is frequently undermined by their susceptibility to operational uncertainty. Image acquisition conditions, such as lighting, device settings, and skin characteristics, introduce variations in optical parameters that compromise the model's reliability in real-world clinical settings. This instability produces an unquantified diagnostic risk, which makes the safe clinical implementation of these powerful systems difficult. With this critical gap in mind, this paper proposes and utilizes global sensitivity analysis to rigorously quantify the robustness of a convolutional neural network architecture with respect to five critical optical image parameters. The analysis aims to quantify the model's instability, moving beyond simple accuracy to provide a robust, risk-quantified assessment. This approach is essential for establishing the level of confidence required for the accreditation and safe clinical deployment of AI-based diagnostic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.