Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913512›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Robust XAI: Quantifying Clinical Risk and Prediction Instability in Dermoscopic Image Classification.

Giulia Vannucci, Renato Patrik Williame Coppolecchia, Roberta Siciliano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulia VannucciDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Polytechnic and Basic Sciences School, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3569-6274
Renato Patrik Williame CoppolecchiaDepartment of Physics, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Roberta SicilianoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Polytechnic and Basic Sciences School, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.

Funding

Italian Ministry of Research PNC0000007Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca PNC0000007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high nominal accuracy achieved by deep learning models in predicting malignant skin lesions is frequently undermined by their susceptibility to operational uncertainty. Image acquisition conditions, such as lighting, device settings, and skin characteristics, introduce variations in optical parameters that compromise the model's reliability in real-world clinical settings. This instability produces an unquantified diagnostic risk, which makes the safe clinical implementation of these powerful systems difficult. With this critical gap in mind, this paper proposes and utilizes global sensitivity analysis to rigorously quantify the robustness of a convolutional neural network architecture with respect to five critical optical image parameters. The analysis aims to quantify the model's instability, moving beyond simple accuracy to provide a robust, risk-quantified assessment. This approach is essential for establishing the level of confidence required for the accreditation and safe clinical deployment of AI-based diagnostic systems.

Indexed as

DermoscopyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsRisk Assessmentclinical riskconvolutional neural networkdermoscopic imagesglobal sensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID41913512
PMCPMC13036371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.