Trial reportJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2026
A post hoc analysis of linaclotide in pediatric patients with functional constipation and neurodevelopmental disorders.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04026113 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Safety and Efficacy Study of Linaclotide in Pediatric Participants, Ages 6 to 17 Years, With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Safety and Efficacy Study of Linaclotide in Pediatric Participants, Ages 6 to 17 Years, With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C) and of Linaclotide Versus Placebo in Pediatric Participants With Functional Constipation (FC)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A post hoc analysis of linaclotide in pediatric patients with functional constipation and neurodevelopmental disorders.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFunctional constipation (FC) is common in children with comorbid neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and its optimal treatment may be challenged by adherence and medication tolerability issues in this population. We assessed the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in pediatric patients with FC and NDD.
methodsThis post hoc analysis of a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study assessed oral linaclotide 72 µg once daily for 12 weeks in patients aged 6-17 years with FC and NDD. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in weekly spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency. In efficacy comparisons, an absolute standardized mean difference (SMD) > 0.2 was considered indicative of a treatment difference.
resultsIn this analysis of 57 pediatric patients (linaclotide n = 25; placebo n = 32), 91% had attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; other NDDs included autism spectrum disorder, tic disorders, and sensory processing disorders. CFB in weekly SBM frequency over 12 weeks was greater with linaclotide versus placebo (2.09 vs. 0.59, respectively; SMD 0.688). Linaclotide was also associated with greater improvements relative to placebo in stool consistency (CFB 1.37 vs. 0.55, respectively) and straining score (CFB -0.98 vs. -0.59). Most patients (≥96%) achieved ≥80% dosing compliance with once-daily administration of linaclotide or placebo. Linaclotide was well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that reported previously.
conclusionsIn children with FC and comorbid NDD, linaclotide 72 µg once daily was associated with improved constipation outcomes, high adherence, and a well-tolerated safety profile, similar to that seen in the overall study population.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04026113 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04026113).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.