ArticleTrends in hearing
Visual Gestures of the Head and Eyebrows Support Prosody Perception for Individuals with Cochlear Implants.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual gestures, especially head movements and eyebrow raises, are time-locked to acoustic cues during the expression of spoken prosody. The present study examined the role these visual cues play in prosody perception, particularly for individuals with cochlear implants (CIs), who often experience challenges understanding prosody due to reduced access to pitch cues. A vocal mimicry paradigm was used to obtain granular, objective measures of prosody perception through acoustic analysis of mimicked sentences. Stimuli consisted of audio-visual recordings from one talker that captured naturally occurring variability in the expression of auditory and visual cues to word focus. Participants mimicked these natural recordings, as well as prosody-transplanted stimuli that allowed us to isolate the influence of auditory or visual prosody cues while holding the other modality at a neutral level (broad focus). Participants converted visual prosody cues into acoustic correlates of prosody in their mimicry, repeating acoustically unfocused words with higher F0 and intensity when those words were paired with video containing head and eyebrow gestures. This visual influence was stronger for participants with CIs than an age-matched group of typical-hearing listeners. CI participants who were less successful at acoustic mimicry tended to be more influenced by visual cues. These results indicate that CI listeners compensate for degraded auditory cues by integrating visual gestures into their perception of spoken prosody, potentially highlighting new targets for multisensory counseling or training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.