Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913471›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Usefulness of Australian Screen Time Guidelines for Toddlers and Preschoolers.

George Thomas, Samara Lau, Sjaan Gomersall, Michalis Stylianou, Matthew Bourke, Stephanie L Duncombe, Ineke Vergeer, Alina Morawska, Stewart Trost, John Cairney and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Usefulness of Australian Screen Time Guidelines for Toddlers and Preschoolers.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

George ThomasHealth and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-7974
Samara LauHealth and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Sjaan GomersallHealth and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Michalis StylianouSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Matthew BourkeHealth and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7088-4516
Stephanie L DuncombeSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-6409
Ineke VergeerCentre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.
Alina MorawskaParenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-5423
Stewart TrostSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
John CairneyHealth and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Stuart BiddleCentre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

UQ HMNS Small Research Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedManaging screen use is a major concern for Australian parents of young children. However, little is known about how parents perceive, understand and appraise national screen time guidelines for children aged between 1 and 5 years. This study examined parental knowledge, attitudes and perceived usefulness of the Australian screen time guidelines and explored associations with sociodemographic factors.

methodsData were drawn from a cross-sectional online survey of Australian parents (n = 229) of young children aged between 1 and 5 years. Knowledge of screen time guidelines (multiple-choice item), attitudes (4 items; 5-point scale) and perceived usefulness (3 items; 5-point scale) were examined. Descriptive statistics were calculated for independent variables and regression models estimated to examine sociodemographic factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and perceived usefulness.

resultsParents of toddlers were 4.45 times (p < 0.001) more likely to know the screen time guidelines than parents of preschoolers. Knowledge was lower among parents in full-time employment and those living in major cities (p < 0.05). Attitudes did not differ by demographics, but parents of girls rated the guidelines as more useful than parents of boys (p = 0.038). Higher attitude scores (p = 0.017) and greater perceived usefulness (p = 0.047) were associated with correctly identifying the guidelines.

conclusionKnowledge gaps exist, particularly among parents of preschoolers, those employed full-time and those living in major cities. Targeted education with diverse parent groups is needed to ensure guidelines are both understood and perceived as useful. SO WHAT?: Inclusive guidelines, supported by tailored education and implementation strategies for key parent groups, may improve understanding and uptake in realistic family contexts.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeParentsScreen TimeAdultAustraliaChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansInfantMaleSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesguidelineshealth promotionparentingpreschoolersscreen usetoddlers

Identifiers

PMID41913471
PMCPMC13036367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.