SynthesisANZ journal of surgery
Intraoperative Variations of Cystic Artery and Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in ANZ journal of surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold-standard treatment for benign gallbladder disease but carries a higher risk of bile duct injury than the open approach, largely due to misidentification of critical hepatobiliary structures. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes intraoperative evidence on the prevalence and surgical relevance of anatomical variations and evaluates their implications for safe LC.
methodsFollowing Evidence-based Anatomy and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, four databases were investigated. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled prevalences and small-study effects were assessed.
resultsTwenty-seven studies (n = 9618) were included. Conventional cystic artery and duct (CA and CD) anatomy was observed in 86.15% and 89.02% of cases, respectively. Among arterial variants, duplicate CA (7.18%) and caterpillar hump of the right hepatic artery (6.26%) were the most common "third elements" entering the hepatocystic triangle. CA positional deviations included courses posterior (14.95%), anterior (10.75%), and inferior (6.23%) to the CD. Aberrant right hepatic duct entering the hepatocystic triangle was recorded in 1.03%.
conclusionsMost CA and CD variations relevant to LC occur within the hepatocystic triangle, where they can interfere with identification of the vascular-biliary pedicle and increase the risk of vasculo-biliary injury. Integrating these findings into the cognitive framework of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) highlights the importance of anticipating "third elements" and heterotopic courses when dissecting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.