Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913467›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2026

Study Protocol for the Development of an African Framework for Critical Care Nursing Based on Ubuntu Using Participatory Cooperative Inquiry: Decolonising Care.

Chris Carter, Michael Kanyanta, Joy Notter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chris CarterBirmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-8584
Michael KanyantaUniversity of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Joy NotterBirmingham City University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical care nursing in Zambia is a new speciality that has adopted traditional nursing documentation and currently uses the Roper, Logan and Tierney's Activities of Daily Living combined with NANDA International (NANDA-I) criteria. It is a cause for concern that these models are based on different high-income domains and are not critical care or context-specific, making integration and application in practice challenging. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a Zambian context-specific critical care nursing framework.

aimsThis study aims to explore intensive care nurses' perceptions of the applicability of currently used nursing models and theories and to develop a new Zambian critical care nursing framework based on the principles of Ubuntu.

methodsThis study will employ a two-phase, mixed-methods approach using a participatory cooperative inquiry design. Phase 1 includes a retrospective review of nursing care plan documentation. This will allow for the identification of the current use of nursing models and theories. Phase 1 utilises documentary data analysis to identify key nursing documentation. Descriptive statistics and, where possible, significant difference will be used to determine patterns and trends. Phase 2 will utilise the findings from phase 1 as the basis for semi-structured focus groups with intensive care nurses within the study site. Total population sampling will be used; therefore, all nurses will be invited to participate. Framework analysis will be used to analyse the qualitative data sets.

conclusionThe outcomes will illustrate the efficiency and effectiveness of nursing documentation and perceptions of using the current nursing model. The findings will be combined to develop a critical care nursing framework based on Ubuntu, which will then be piloted. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study has been designed in response to recognition that critical care nursing practice needs to context specific to enhance the nursing care provided.

Indexed as

Critical Care NursingModels, NursingStandardized Nursing TerminologyHumansRetrospective StudiesZambia

Identifiers

PMID41913467
PMCPMC13036368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.