ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026
Participatory action research to align Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) priorities with community needs in Uttar Pradesh, India.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParticipatory action research (PAR) methods effectively engage communities in identifying health priorities in low-resource settings. This study applied PAR methods during the establishment of a Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
methodsWe implemented seven PAR methods across rural and urban populations: transect walks, resource mapping, social mapping, seasonal mapping, focus group discussions, semi-structured interviews, and community ranking exercises. Data were collected in September 2023 following facilitator training. Visual materials and field notes were thematically categorized, while audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, translated, and analysed with combined inductive-deductive thematic analysis. Community health priorities were quantitatively analysed through free listing, pile sorting, and ranking.
resultsFive major themes emerged: (1) Community context revealed diverse caste compositions and essential infrastructure; (2) Health priorities included acute conditions (fever, joint pain), chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes), healthcare access limitations, and WASH issues; (3) Key contributors to poor health encompassed inadequate WASH facilities, limited health awareness, and discrimination; (4) Healthcare access barriers included absent primary care facilities, financial constraints, limited transportation, and poor service quality; (5) Community suggestions addressed both social determinants and healthcare services, emphasizing governance participation, WASH interventions, and improved healthcare infrastructure.
conclusionsPAR methods successfully identified community-defined health needs and barriers, demonstrating consistency across urban and rural settings. Community members provided concrete recommendations for health system improvements, validating the importance of incorporating local voices in HDSS design. The alignment between community priorities and documented regional health challenges underscores how participatory methods can shape surveillance activities to foster sustainable health improvements and enhance governance capacities. These insights directly informed HDSS operational plans, creating a foundation for responsive and equitable health surveillance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.