Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913453›Full record

ArticleEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2026

Genetic sensitivity to the environment moderates the impact of positive and negative childhood experiences on psychological adjustment "for good and for bad".

Pilar Torrecilla, Valeria Lavín, Angelo Arias-Magnasco, Bochao Danae Lin, Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Jeroen Decoster, Ruud van Winkel, Dina Collip, Philippe Delespaul, Marc De Hert and 7 more

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Pilar TorrecillaDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, https://ror.org/052g8jq94Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-6014
Valeria LavínDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, https://ror.org/052g8jq94Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-8524
Angelo Arias-MagnascoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-0989-9049
Bochao Danae LinDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Claudia Menne-LothmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jeroen DecosterDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8614-7000
Ruud van WinkelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, https://ror.org/00xmkp704Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dina CollipDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2323-5780
Philippe DelespaulDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-0898
Marc De Herthttps://ror.org/05f950310University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4255-5920
Catherine DeromDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, https://ror.org/00xmkp704Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-796X
Every ThieryDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, https://ror.org/05f950310Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nele JacobsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4021-4014
Jim van OsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7245-1586
Bart RuttenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9834-6346
Sinan GuloksuzDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, https://ror.org/02d9ce178Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6626-1874
Neus Barrantes-VidalDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, https://ror.org/052g8jq94Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-1238

Funding

Generalitat de Catalunya 2021SGR01010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vulnerability-stress framework guiding gene-environment interaction (GxE) research overlooks the role of positive experiences. The Differential Susceptibility (DS) model offers a broader perspective, suggesting that individuals vary in sensitivity to

methodsThe sample consisted of 638 twins from the first wave of the TwinssCan study, a general population twin cohort. PGS-ES and adversity, bullying and positive experiences in childhood were collected, along with assessments of psychotic, affective, functioning, and positive mental health. GxE interactions were tested under a competitive-confirmatory approach.

resultsDS effects were found for the interactions between PGS-ES and all environmental exposures on schizotypic eccentricity and functioning. Adolescents with high genetic sensitivity were rated as more eccentric and less functional under childhood adversity but were rated as less eccentric and better adjusted under childhood favorable conditions. DS also resulted from the interaction between PGS-ES and positive childhood on social coping. No significant models emerged for internalizing or wellbeing.

conclusionFindings overall supported DS, indicating that genetic sensitivity to the environment operates in a "for better and for worse" manner depending on the quality of environmental exposures. It extends initial evidence that DS applies to nonclinical psychosis expression and highlights the importance of considering the full spectrum of environmental conditions to understand both risk and opportunity factors in GxE.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesEmotional AdjustmentGene-Environment InteractionPsychotic DisordersAdolescentAdultChildFemaleGenetic Risk ScoreHumansMaleDifferential Susceptibilitygene–environment interactionpsychosisresiliencerisk

Identifiers

PMID41913453
PMCPMC13122527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.