Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913319›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

The interplay between hydraulic capacitance and stomatal regulation strategy affects soil-plant hydraulics and transpiration.

Stefano Martinetti, Andrea Carminati, Peter Molnar, Marius G Floriancic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefano MartinettiDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0296-0936
Andrea CarminatiDepartment of Environmental System Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-0480
Peter MolnarDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6437-4931
Marius G FloriancicDepartment of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8093, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5108-4580

Funding

ETH Grant ETH-27 21-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant water storage contributes to transpiration, but it is unclear how its relevance in supporting transpiration depends on the stringency of stomatal regulation. Here, we show the compounding effect of stomatal regulation and hydraulic capacitance on plant water use, by means of a soil-plant hydraulic model and measurements of leaf water potential, sap flow, stomatal conductance and capacitance in beech and spruce in the field. We found that large capacitance led to a large buffering effect on leaf water potential, explained by increasing amounts of transpiration sourced from internal plant water storage. However, the extent to which capacitance allows plants to sustain transpiration depends on the stringency of stomatal regulation. For stomata that limit leaf water potential at a fixed threshold (as observed in spruce), large capacitance increased transpiration throughout all soil water conditions. By contrast, for flexible stomatal regulation mechanisms optimizing transpiration over leaf water potential (as observed in beech), large capacitance caused stomata to close earlier in the day under wet soil conditions. Our findings suggest a trade-off between developing tissues that can store large water volumes and stomatal regulation mechanisms that allow leaf water potential to reach more negative values during periods of high transpiration demand.

Indexed as

FagusPiceaPlant StomataPlant TranspirationSoilWaterModels, BiologicalPlant LeavesSoilWaterbeechhydraulic capacitanceleaf water potentialplant water storagesoil–plant hydraulicssprucestomatal regulation strategytranspiration

Identifiers

PMID41913319
PMCPMC13150304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.