Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41913258›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical case reports2026

Adult-onset refractory retroperitoneal neuroblastoma with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges: a case report and review of literature.

Nitesh Kumar Karna, Gopal Pokhrel, Akshyata Osti, Nitesh Neupane, Popular Pokhrel, Karun Bhattarai, Rajan Ray, Shreejan Khanal, Rajeev Sharma, Soniya Dulal

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nitesh Kumar KarnaB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal. niteshkumarkarna2022@bpkihs.edu.np.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9810-808X
Gopal PokhrelB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Akshyata OstiB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Nitesh NeupaneB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Popular PokhrelB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Karun BhattaraiB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Rajan RayB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Shreejan KhanalB.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, P.O. Box No.7053, Dharan, Nepal.
Rajeev SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Soniya DulalDepartment of Internal Medicine, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroblastoma is a rare, aggressive childhood malignancy originating from neural crest progenitor cells of the sympathetic nervous system. While primarily a pediatric tumor, adult-onset neuroblastoma poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges owing to its rarity, absence of standardized treatment protocols, and poor response to therapy. This case highlights a unique presentation of refractory retroperitoneal neuroblastoma in an adult female patient, managed with limited resources in a resource-constrained setting. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old female from a Dalit community in eastern Nepal presented with a 2-month history of abdominal pain, early satiety, and bloating. Imaging revealed a large retroperitoneal mass encasing critical vascular structures. Histopathology and biopsy confirmed neuroblastoma, but cytogenetic analysis could not be performed owing to resource limitations. The tumor was classified as stage L2 per the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Staging System. Surgical resection was deemed infeasible owing to tumor encasement of major vessels. The patient was treated with eight cycles of alternating vincristine, cisplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide; and vincristine, carboplatin, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy regimens, resulting in minimal tumor shrinkage. Subsequent palliative chemotherapy with temozolomide and irinotecan also failed to induce significant tumor regression. Advanced therapeutic options such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy were unavailable owing to resource constraints, leaving the patient with limited treatment options.

conclusionThis case underscores the challenges in diagnosing and managing adult-onset neuroblastoma, particularly in resource-limited settings where advanced diagnostic and therapeutic options are unavailable. The absence of standardized treatment protocols for adult neuroblastoma highlights the need for focused research on context-adapted treatment algorithms, affordable molecular diagnostics, and cost-effective therapeutic approaches, particularly in resource-limited settings. This report emphasizes the importance of collaborative efforts to develop globally accessible treatment strategies for rare and aggressive malignancies such as refractory neuroblastoma, particularly in underserved regions.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeuroblastomaRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsAdultCyclophosphamideEtoposideFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeVincristineCyclophosphamideEtoposideVincristineAdult onsetNeuroblastomaRare tumorRefractoryRetroperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID41913258
PMCPMC13159337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.