ArticleGenome biology2026
Benchmarking single-cell tumor immune atlases and application for uncovering cell states related to immunotherapy response.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe tumor immune microenvironment, containing a variety of immune cells with both tumor-promoting and anti-tumoral functions, plays a significant role in tumor immune surveillance and immunological evasion. Characterizing the landscape of the tumor immune microenvironment at the single-cell level is crucial for both cancer diagnosis and treatment strategy design. While current efforts to develop single-cell tumor immune atlases have laid a foundation for understanding the complexity and heterogeneity of the tumor immune microenvironment, existing atlases vary in their data sources, integration and annotation strategies, and the number and definition of cell types, posing challenges in selection.
resultsWe systematically benchmarked five single-cell tumor immune atlases, comprising two pan-cancer and three cancer-specific ones. We first assessed their similarities and distinct characteristics of major immune cell subpopulations, including T, NK, B, macrophage, and dendritic cells. Next, we utilized each atlas as a reference to perform supervised annotation of six single-cell immuno-transcriptomics datasets, two with expert manual labels and four without. We evaluated annotation performance based on agreement with manual labels, mapping success, accuracy, clusterability, annotatability, and stability. Notably, supervised annotations consistently outperformed unsupervised clustering in identifying cell states related to immunotherapy response.
conclusionsOur study provides insights into the characteristics and quality of existing atlases, demonstrating their utility in delivering harmonized annotations across datasets and uncovering crucial immune components associated with immunotherapy response. It also highlights key requirements and directions for the development of future atlases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.