ArticleBMC health services research2026
From scale development to strategic action: internal service quality and importance-performance analysis findings in Taiwan's long-term care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Work motivation profiles and work engagement among nursing assistants in Chinese aged care institutions: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTaiwan is rapidly transitioning into a super-aged society, leading to an increased reliance on long-term care (LTC) institutions. High staff turnover remains a critical challenge for the industry globally. While internal service quality (ISQ) is recognized as a key driver of employee retention, there is a systemic lack of scientifically validated scales specifically tailored to the unique demands of LTC contexts, a research gap that persists both in Taiwan and internationally. This study aims to develop a validated ISQ scale that addresses this global empirical void and to identify strategic priorities for institutional management.
methodsThe study employed a multi-stage methodology. First, a Modified Delphi Method was conducted with a panel of 12 experts over two rounds to construct and validate the ISQ scale. Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and consensus thresholds were used for item selection. Second, a survey was administered to 364 LTC professionals (nurses, caregivers, social workers and Managers / Administrative Staff) across Taiwan. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability/validity testing (Cronbach’s alpha, CR, and AVE), and Importance–Performance Analysis (IPA) to identify service gaps.
resultsThe final validated ISQ scale consists of 29 items across five dimensions: Tangibles, Responsiveness, Reliability, Assurance, and Empathy. All dimensions showed high reliability (Cronbach’s α > 0.80) and convergent validity. A significant service quality gap was identified, with an overall mean importance score of 4.24 compared to a satisfaction score of 3.13 (Gap = -1.11). IPA results revealed seven items in Quadrant II (“Concentrate Here”), highlighting critical weaknesses in soft management, including managers’ fairness in addressing issues, willingness to listen to staff feelings, and service enthusiasm. Conversely, salary payment and rotation systems were identified as core institutional strengths.
conclusionsThis study provides the first scientifically grounded ISQ measurement tool for the LTC sector in Taiwan. The findings suggest that while institutions perform well in tangible and financial aspects, a strategic shift toward empathetic leadership and organizational fairness is essential to improve staff morale. Policymakers and managers should integrate these qualitative ISQ indicators into evaluation frameworks to address workforce shortages and enhance external care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.