ArticleMalaria journal2026
Nationally representative programmatic surveillance of mosquito and human behaviours that influence human exposure to malaria transmission and the impact of vector control across Tanzania.
Article in Malaria journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntegrated entomological and anthropological surveillance of interacting mosquito and human behaviours is critical for understanding malaria transmission risks and for tailoring intervention packages, but it is yet to be implemented at scale due to a lack of practical, affordable procedures for nationally representative monitoring. This study in Tanzania introduces and field-tests the first such scalable framework design and reports summaries of the earliest data generated, thus demonstrating its feasibility and utility for generating programmatically informative indicators of both mosquito and human behaviours.
methodsA single village was randomly selected from each of twenty-five ecologically and epidemiologically diverse sentinel districts distributed across Tanzania for simultaneous surveys of malaria vector and human behaviours, using a rolling cross-sectional design. Entomological and anthropological surveys were repeated approximately annually over three years, with each village surveyed on three separate occasions across wet and dry seasons to account for temporal variations between sites due to seasons. Mosquito electrocuting traps (MET) were employed for sampling mosquitoes both indoors and outdoors with human behaviour surveyed by standard questionnaire.
resultsEntomological and anthropological indicators were successfully and simultaneously measured in all 25 sentinel districts. Anopheles arabiensis was widespread across the country, whilst Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles funestus s.s. were more localized. Despite being collected in small numbers, blood-fed An. funestus s.s. and An. gambiae s.s. were predominantly human-fed, whereas An. arabiensis, An. quadriannulatus and An. leesoni fed predominantly on cattle. Higher proportions of host-seeking An. arabiensis were caught outdoors (64.9%) than An. gambiae s.s. (58.4%) or An. funestus s.s. (42.4%). Across all age groups, people were more likely to be outdoors during the early evening hours (18:00 to 21:00), with the highest proportions observed among adolescents (13-17 years) and adults (≥ 18 years) compared to under-fives (0-5 years) and children (6-12 years). Adolescent males were less likely to use bednet relative to other demographic groups. Higher temperatures were associated with reduced reported bednet use during the dry season but not during the wet season.
conclusionThis national surveillance framework proved highly effective for measuring relevant metrics of mosquito and human behaviours that can inform optimization of malaria control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.